The Equator Principles

... min read Listen

The Equator Principles (EP) are a framework used by financial institutions to determine, assess and manage environmental and social risk in projects.

The EP are adopted and applied voluntarily by what’s known as ’Equator Principles Financial Institutions’, or EPFIs. More than 100 EPFIs in 38 countries have officially adopted the EP, covering the majority of international project finance debt within developed and emerging markets.

The fourth review update of the Equator Principles was adopted in November 2019. Amendments and new commitments were made related to human rights, climate change, indigenous peoples and biodiversity. The scope of the EPs has also been extended to capture more project-related transactions.
ING was one of the 10 first adopters of the EP in 2003 and was one of the process coordinators for the fourth review update. We acted as chair of the Steering Committee in 2012—2014, where we played a key role in finalising its second review update. We actively advocate and enforce the EP, as we recognise their ability to positively contribute to society.

ING has a well-established Environmental and Social Risk Framework (ESR Framework) that lists the standards we expect of clients and ourselves, including application of the EP.

Applying the Equator Principles

As an Equator Principles Financial Institution (EPFI) we don’t provide project finance or project-related corporate loans to clients that are unable to or choose not to comply with the principles.

We also implement the EP in our internal environmental and social policies, procedures and standards. These are embedded in our ESR Framework, and require involvement of the following three banking areas:

  1. Front Office: The departments that originate transactions and have direct contact with clients or sponsors.
  2. Risk Managers: The departments that provide control over Front Office activities and generally can sign off on the environmental and social impacts for ’low-risk’ EP deals.
  3. Environmental and Social Risk: The dedicated department within risk management that assesses environmental and social impacts associated with ’high-risk’ transactions.

An example of how the Equator Principles form part of our transaction assessment:

Sarulla – geothermal power plant:

“ING was one of the financiers of the world’s largest geothermal facilities, under construction on the Indonesian island of Sumatra since 2014. The project develops the steam resources, constructs and operates the geothermal power plants with a total net deliverable capacity of 330 MW for 30 years. Three power plants will be built, including a 20 km transmission line as interface point with the national electricity grid.

The transaction was assessed in accordance with the Equator Principles and our Environmental and Social Risk Policy for the energy sector. An independent technical, environmental and social due diligence was also applied to the project to ensure that appropriate environmental and social management plans were in place. We initially identified some safety, biodiversity and social impacts that had to be addressed prior to any approval for finance, in order for the project to comply with our Environmental and Social Risk policies and the applicable Environmental & Social standards .

Regarding safety, the project area may be affected by earthquakes. We therefore requested the project to comply with the international seismic design codes and monitoring of micro tremoring and slope stability assessments. The project is currently under construction and the latest monitoring reports confirm good progress in this respect.

The majority of the project’s environmental footprint is located within a modified habitat with an unlikely, although possible impact on endangered species. The project therefore conducted field surveys, developed a biodiversity action plan and a biodiversity offset management plan in line with applicable international standards. As a consequence, the project is committed to successfully apply a biodiversity mitigation hierarchy.

Social impacts involved the right of way affecting part of the land used by some households. We requested the project to manage this issue in compliance with the requirements of the related IFC Performance Standards. As a consequence, consultation and participation activities are organised for the affected households and are effective to date. The project in fact delivers public consultations and disclosure activities in various forms and has established an effective grievance mechanism.

We are pleased to see the positive developments brought by the efforts of the Sarulla management team. In addition to adequately mitigating environmental and social risks, this project will reduce Indonesia’s reliance on diesel and provide long-term reliable electricity to an area subject to power shortages through renewable energy production.”

The full text of the Equator Principles can be found at

Please find ING’s 2018 Equator Principles reporting on the Equator Principles website.

Back to top